· PathShield Security Team · 12 min read
Azure Security Center vs Agentless Scanning: Cost Comparison for Small Businesses
Azure Security Center (now Microsoft Defender for Cloud) costs the average SMB $3,750 per month for just 50 virtual machines – and that’s before accounting for the 15-20% performance overhead from agents. For small businesses running lean operations, this can mean choosing between security and staying profitable.
TL;DR: Agentless scanning alternatives can reduce Azure security costs by 70-85% while eliminating performance overhead. This guide provides real cost calculations, feature comparisons, and implementation strategies for organizations with 50-500 VMs looking to optimize their security spend without compromising protection.
The Hidden Costs of Azure Security Center
Microsoft Defender for Cloud appears straightforward at $15 per server per month. But the real costs tell a different story:
Direct Costs Breakdown (50 VMs)
Component | Monthly Cost | Annual Cost |
---|---|---|
Defender for Servers | $750 | $9,000 |
Defender for Storage (10 accounts) | $100 | $1,200 |
Defender for Key Vault | $10 | $120 |
Defender for SQL (5 instances) | $750 | $9,000 |
Log Analytics Workspace (150GB) | $345 | $4,140 |
Total Direct Costs | $1,955 | $23,460 |
Hidden Performance Costs
The Microsoft Monitoring Agent (MMA) and Azure Monitor Agent consume significant resources:
# Typical agent resource consumption
$agentOverhead = @{
CPU = "10-15%"
Memory = "200-500 MB"
Disk = "2-5 IOPS continuous"
Network = "1-2 Mbps sustained"
}
# For a D2s_v3 instance ($96/month)
$performanceImpact = $96 * 0.15 # 15% overhead
$monthlyOverheadPerVM = $14.40
$totalMonthlyOverhead = $14.40 * 50 # $720/month
Real impact: A 50-VM environment pays an additional $8,640 annually in compute costs due to agent overhead.
Azure Security Center Pricing Deep Dive
Let’s examine the complete pricing structure for different organization sizes:
Small Business (50 VMs)
Environment:
VMs: 50
Storage_Accounts: 10
SQL_Databases: 5
Key_Vaults: 3
Monthly_Log_Volume: 150GB
Monthly_Costs:
Defender_for_Servers: $750
Defender_for_Storage: $100
Defender_for_SQL: $750
Defender_for_Key_Vault: $30
Log_Analytics: $345
Network_Watcher: $50
Total: $2,025
Annual_Total: $24,300
Three_Year_TCO: $72,900
Growing Business (200 VMs)
Environment:
VMs: 200
Storage_Accounts: 40
SQL_Databases: 20
Key_Vaults: 10
Monthly_Log_Volume: 600GB
Monthly_Costs:
Defender_for_Servers: $3,000
Defender_for_Storage: $400
Defender_for_SQL: $3,000
Defender_for_Key_Vault: $100
Log_Analytics: $1,380
Network_Watcher: $200
Total: $8,080
Annual_Total: $96,960
Three_Year_TCO: $290,880
Enterprise (500 VMs)
Environment:
VMs: 500
Storage_Accounts: 100
SQL_Databases: 50
Key_Vaults: 25
Monthly_Log_Volume: 1500GB
Monthly_Costs:
Defender_for_Servers: $7,500
Defender_for_Storage: $1,000
Defender_for_SQL: $7,500
Defender_for_Key_Vault: $250
Log_Analytics: $3,450
Network_Watcher: $500
Total: $20,200
Annual_Total: $242,400
Three_Year_TCO: $727,200
Agentless Alternatives Overview
Agentless scanning uses Azure’s native APIs to assess security without installing software on VMs:
How Agentless Scanning Works
# Agentless scanning approach
$scanningMethod = @{
DataCollection = "Azure Resource Graph API"
Authentication = "Service Principal with Reader role"
Performance = "Zero impact on target VMs"
Coverage = "Configuration, compliance, vulnerabilities"
Frequency = "Continuous or scheduled"
}
# Example: Query resource configurations
Search-AzGraph -Query @"
Resources
| where type =~ 'microsoft.compute/virtualmachines'
| extend nsgId = tostring(properties.networkProfile.networkInterfaces[0].id)
| project name, location, nsgId, properties.hardwareProfile.vmSize
"@
Cost Comparison: Agentless Solutions
Solution Type | 50 VMs/Month | 200 VMs/Month | 500 VMs/Month |
---|---|---|---|
Azure Security Center | $2,025 | $8,080 | $20,200 |
Custom Agentless (DIY) | $150 | $400 | $800 |
Commercial Agentless | $500 | $1,500 | $3,000 |
Hybrid Approach | $750 | $2,500 | $5,500 |
Savings vs ASC | 75-92% | 69-95% | 73-96% |
Performance Impact Analysis
The performance difference between agent-based and agentless is substantial:
Agent-Based Impact Measurement
# Script to measure agent performance impact
function Measure-AgentImpact {
param(
[string]$VMName,
[int]$DurationMinutes = 60
)
$metrics = @()
$endTime = (Get-Date).AddMinutes($DurationMinutes)
while ((Get-Date) -lt $endTime) {
$vm = Get-AzVM -Name $VMName -Status
$metrics += Get-AzMetric -ResourceId $vm.Id `
-TimeGrain 00:01:00 `
-MetricName "Percentage CPU" `
-StartTime (Get-Date).AddMinutes(-5)
Start-Sleep -Seconds 300
}
$avgCPU = ($metrics | Measure-Object -Average Value).Average
return @{
VMName = $VMName
AverageCPU = $avgCPU
EstimatedOverhead = "$([math]::Round($avgCPU * 0.15, 2))%"
MonthlyCost = "$([math]::Round($vm.HardwareProfile.VMSize.Cost * 0.15, 2))"
}
}
Real-World Performance Comparison
Metric | Agent-Based | Agentless | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
CPU Overhead | 10-15% | 0% | 100% reduction |
Memory Usage | 200-500MB | 0MB | 100% reduction |
Network Traffic | 1-2 Mbps | 0 Mbps | 100% reduction |
Disk IOPS | 2-5 continuous | 0 | 100% reduction |
Boot Time Impact | +30-45 seconds | 0 seconds | 100% reduction |
Update Downtime | 5-10 min/month | 0 | 100% reduction |
Coverage Comparison Table
Not all features are equal between solutions. Here’s what you get:
Security Coverage Matrix
Feature | Azure Security Center | Agentless Scanning | Coverage Gap |
---|---|---|---|
VM Configuration | ✅ Full | ✅ Full | None |
Network Security | ✅ Full | ✅ Full | None |
Storage Security | ✅ Full | ✅ Full | None |
Identity & Access | ✅ Full | ✅ Full | None |
Compliance Scoring | ✅ Full | ✅ Full | None |
Vulnerability Assessment | ✅ Deep | ⚠️ Limited | OS patches |
File Integrity | ✅ Real-time | ❌ Not available | FIM |
Process Monitoring | ✅ Full | ❌ Not available | Runtime |
Threat Intelligence | ✅ Integrated | ⚠️ API-based | Real-time |
Auto-remediation | ✅ Full | ✅ Full | None |
Compliance Framework Support
Framework | Azure Security Center | Agentless | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
CIS Azure Benchmark | ✅ Native | ✅ Full | API-based checks |
PCI-DSS | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Custom | Template required |
HIPAA | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Custom | Template required |
ISO 27001 | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Partial | Config focus |
SOC 2 | ✅ Reports | ✅ Evidence | Manual mapping |
NIST 800-53 | ✅ Native | ✅ Full | Policy-based |
Implementation Complexity
Azure Security Center Setup Time
# Typical ASC deployment timeline
$ascDeployment = @{
Planning = "1-2 weeks"
AgentDeployment = "2-3 days"
PolicyConfiguration = "3-5 days"
LogAnalyticsSetup = "1-2 days"
TuningAndOptimization = "2-4 weeks"
TotalTime = "4-8 weeks"
}
# Agent deployment script
$vms = Get-AzVM
foreach ($vm in $vms) {
Set-AzVMExtension `
-ResourceGroupName $vm.ResourceGroupName `
-VMName $vm.Name `
-Name "MicrosoftMonitoringAgent" `
-Publisher "Microsoft.EnterpriseCloud.Monitoring" `
-ExtensionType "MicrosoftMonitoringAgent" `
-TypeHandlerVersion "1.0" `
-Settings @{"workspaceId" = $WorkspaceId} `
-ProtectedSettings @{"workspaceKey" = $WorkspaceKey}
}
Agentless Implementation
# Agentless setup - typically 1-2 hours
$agentlessDeployment = @{
ServicePrincipalCreation = "10 minutes"
PermissionAssignment = "5 minutes"
ScannerDeployment = "30 minutes"
InitialScan = "15-30 minutes"
TotalTime = "1-2 hours"
}
# Create service principal for scanning
$sp = New-AzADServicePrincipal `
-DisplayName "AgentlessSecurityScanner" `
-Role "Reader"
# Grant additional permissions
New-AzRoleAssignment `
-ObjectId $sp.Id `
-RoleDefinitionName "Security Reader" `
-Scope "/subscriptions/$subscriptionId"
# Deploy scanner function
$functionApp = New-AzFunctionApp `
-ResourceGroupName "security-rg" `
-Name "agentless-scanner" `
-StorageAccount "scannerstore" `
-Runtime "PowerShell" `
-RuntimeVersion "7.2"
Real Cost Calculations for Different Scenarios
Scenario 1: Development Environment (25 VMs)
Current_State_with_ASC:
Monthly_Costs:
Defender: $375
Log_Analytics: $172
Agent_Overhead: $360
Total: $907
Annual: $10,884
Agentless_Alternative:
Monthly_Costs:
Scanner_Infrastructure: $50
Storage: $25
Automation: $25
Total: $100
Annual: $1,200
Savings: $9,684/year (89% reduction)
Scenario 2: Production SaaS (100 VMs)
Current_State_with_ASC:
Monthly_Costs:
Defender_for_Servers: $1,500
Defender_for_Databases: $1,500
Log_Analytics: $690
Agent_Overhead: $1,440
Total: $5,130
Annual: $61,560
Agentless_Alternative:
Monthly_Costs:
Commercial_Platform: $999
No_Agent_Overhead: $0
Total: $999
Annual: $11,988
Savings: $49,572/year (81% reduction)
Scenario 3: Multi-Cloud Enterprise (300 VMs)
Azure_Security_Center_Only:
Monthly_Costs:
Azure_VMs_(150): $2,250
Cannot_Cover_AWS_(100): $0
Cannot_Cover_GCP_(50): $0
Need_Additional_Tools: $3,000
Total: $5,250
Annual: $63,000
Agentless_Multi_Cloud:
Monthly_Costs:
Single_Platform_All_Clouds: $2,500
No_Agent_Overhead: $0
Total: $2,500
Annual: $30,000
Savings: $33,000/year (52% reduction)
Plus: Single pane of glass for all clouds
Implementation Guide: Building Your Own Agentless Scanner
Step 1: Create the Scanner Infrastructure
# Resource Group and Storage
New-AzResourceGroup -Name "agentless-security" -Location "eastus"
$storage = New-AzStorageAccount `
-ResourceGroupName "agentless-security" `
-Name "securityscanner$(Get-Random)" `
-SkuName "Standard_LRS" `
-Location "eastus"
# Create Function App for scanning
$functionApp = New-AzFunctionApp `
-ResourceGroupName "agentless-security" `
-Name "security-scanner-$(Get-Random)" `
-StorageAccountName $storage.StorageAccountName `
-Runtime "PowerShell" `
-RuntimeVersion "7.2" `
-OSType "Linux" `
-Location "eastus"
Step 2: Implement the Scanner Function
# scanner/run.ps1
using namespace System.Net
param($Timer)
# Connect using Managed Identity
Connect-AzAccount -Identity
$findings = @()
# Check VM Security Configurations
$vms = Get-AzVM -Status
foreach ($vm in $vms) {
# Check for public IPs
$nics = Get-AzNetworkInterface | Where-Object {
$_.VirtualMachine.Id -eq $vm.Id
}
foreach ($nic in $nics) {
if ($nic.IpConfigurations.PublicIpAddress) {
$findings += @{
Severity = "High"
Resource = $vm.Name
Issue = "VM has public IP address"
Recommendation = "Use Azure Bastion or VPN"
}
}
}
# Check disk encryption
if (-not $vm.StorageProfile.OsDisk.EncryptionSettings.Enabled) {
$findings += @{
Severity = "High"
Resource = $vm.Name
Issue = "OS disk not encrypted"
Recommendation = "Enable Azure Disk Encryption"
}
}
# Check for managed identity
if (-not $vm.Identity) {
$findings += @{
Severity = "Medium"
Resource = $vm.Name
Issue = "No managed identity configured"
Recommendation = "Enable system-assigned managed identity"
}
}
}
# Check Storage Account Security
$storageAccounts = Get-AzStorageAccount
foreach ($sa in $storageAccounts) {
# Check HTTPS only
if (-not $sa.EnableHttpsTrafficOnly) {
$findings += @{
Severity = "High"
Resource = $sa.StorageAccountName
Issue = "Storage allows HTTP traffic"
Recommendation = "Enable HTTPS only"
}
}
# Check network restrictions
if ($sa.NetworkRuleSet.DefaultAction -eq "Allow") {
$findings += @{
Severity = "Medium"
Resource = $sa.StorageAccountName
Issue = "Storage account publicly accessible"
Recommendation = "Configure network restrictions"
}
}
# Check encryption
if (-not $sa.Encryption.KeySource -eq "Microsoft.Keyvault") {
$findings += @{
Severity = "Low"
Resource = $sa.StorageAccountName
Issue = "Not using customer-managed keys"
Recommendation = "Consider CMK for sensitive data"
}
}
}
# Check Network Security Groups
$nsgs = Get-AzNetworkSecurityGroup
foreach ($nsg in $nsgs) {
$dangerousRules = $nsg.SecurityRules | Where-Object {
$_.SourceAddressPrefix -eq "*" -and
$_.Access -eq "Allow" -and
$_.Direction -eq "Inbound" -and
$_.DestinationPortRange -in @("22", "3389", "1433", "3306", "5432")
}
foreach ($rule in $dangerousRules) {
$findings += @{
Severity = "Critical"
Resource = "$($nsg.Name)/$($rule.Name)"
Issue = "Dangerous port $($rule.DestinationPortRange) open to internet"
Recommendation = "Restrict source IP addresses"
}
}
}
# Send critical findings to email
$criticalFindings = $findings | Where-Object { $_.Severity -eq "Critical" }
if ($criticalFindings.Count -gt 0) {
$body = $criticalFindings | ConvertTo-Html -Fragment
Send-MailMessage `
-To "security@company.com" `
-Subject "Critical Security Findings" `
-Body $body `
-BodyAsHtml
}
# Store all findings
$storageContext = $storage.Context
$findings | ConvertTo-Json | Out-File -FilePath "./findings.json"
Set-AzStorageBlobContent `
-File "./findings.json" `
-Container "findings" `
-Blob "scan-$(Get-Date -Format 'yyyy-MM-dd-HH-mm').json" `
-Context $storageContext
Write-Output "Scan complete. Found $($findings.Count) issues."
Step 3: Automate Remediation
# auto-remediation/run.ps1
param($Finding)
Connect-AzAccount -Identity
switch ($Finding.Issue) {
"Storage allows HTTP traffic" {
Set-AzStorageAccount `
-ResourceGroupName $Finding.ResourceGroup `
-Name $Finding.Resource `
-EnableHttpsTrafficOnly $true
Write-Output "Enabled HTTPS-only for $($Finding.Resource)"
}
"VM has public IP address" {
# Alert but don't auto-remove (might be intentional)
Send-Alert -Message "Public IP detected on $($Finding.Resource)" `
-Severity "High"
}
"OS disk not encrypted" {
# Complex operation - create ticket
New-ServiceTicket `
-Title "Enable disk encryption for $($Finding.Resource)" `
-Priority "High" `
-Description $Finding.Recommendation
}
"Dangerous port * open to internet" {
# Auto-remediate critical exposures
if ($Finding.Severity -eq "Critical") {
$nsg = Get-AzNetworkSecurityGroup -Name $Finding.Resource.Split('/')[0]
$rule = $nsg.SecurityRules | Where-Object { $_.Name -eq $Finding.Resource.Split('/')[1] }
# Update rule to restrict source
$rule.SourceAddressPrefix = $env:OFFICE_IP_RANGE
$nsg | Set-AzNetworkSecurityGroup
Write-Output "Restricted dangerous rule $($Finding.Resource)"
}
}
}
Migration Strategy: From ASC to Agentless
Phase 1: Parallel Running (Week 1-2)
# Deploy agentless alongside ASC
Deploy-AgentlessScanner -ResourceGroup "security-rg"
# Compare findings
$ascFindings = Get-AzSecurityAlert
$agentlessFindings = Get-AgentlessFindings
Compare-Object $ascFindings $agentlessFindings -Property ResourceId, Severity
Phase 2: Validation (Week 3-4)
# Validate coverage
$coverageReport = @{
TotalResources = (Get-AzResource).Count
ASCCoverage = (Get-AzSecurityAssessment).Count
AgentlessCoverage = (Get-AgentlessAssessment).Count
CoveragePercentage = [math]::Round(($agentlessCoverage / $ascCoverage) * 100, 2)
}
if ($coverageReport.CoveragePercentage -ge 95) {
Write-Output "✅ Agentless coverage sufficient for migration"
}
Phase 3: Agent Removal (Week 5)
# Remove agents from non-critical systems first
$nonProdVMs = Get-AzVM -Tag @{Environment = "Development"}
foreach ($vm in $nonProdVMs) {
Remove-AzVMExtension `
-ResourceGroupName $vm.ResourceGroupName `
-VMName $vm.Name `
-Name "MicrosoftMonitoringAgent" `
-Force
}
# Monitor for issues
Start-Sleep -Seconds 86400 # Wait 24 hours
if ((Get-SecurityIncidents -Last24Hours).Count -eq 0) {
# Proceed with production
Remove-ProductionAgents
}
Advanced Configuration: Hybrid Approach
For organizations needing deep runtime security on critical systems:
Selective Agent Deployment
# Define critical systems that need agents
$criticalSystems = @{
Criteria = @(
"Tier = 0", # Domain controllers
"DataClassification = Sensitive",
"Compliance = PCI",
"InternetFacing = True"
)
}
# Deploy agents only to critical systems
$criticalVMs = Get-AzVM | Where-Object {
$_.Tags.Tier -eq "0" -or
$_.Tags.DataClassification -eq "Sensitive"
}
# Use agentless for everything else
$standardVMs = Get-AzVM | Where-Object {
$_.Name -notin $criticalVMs.Name
}
Write-Output @"
Hybrid Deployment:
- Agent-based: $($criticalVMs.Count) VMs (Critical)
- Agentless: $($standardVMs.Count) VMs (Standard)
- Monthly Savings: $([math]::Round($standardVMs.Count * 15, 2))
"@
Cost Optimization Matrix
VM Type | Security Need | Recommended Approach | Cost/VM/Month |
---|---|---|---|
Dev/Test | Basic | Agentless | $2-5 |
Production Web | High | Agentless + WAF | $10-15 |
Database | Critical | Hybrid | $20-25 |
Domain Controller | Critical | Full Agent | $30-35 |
Container Host | High | Agentless + Runtime | $15-20 |
ROI Calculator: Making the Business Case
function Calculate-SecurityROI {
param(
[int]$VMCount = 50,
[string]$CurrentSolution = "AzureSecurityCenter",
[decimal]$AverageVMCost = 100
)
# Current costs
$ascCosts = @{
Licensing = $VMCount * 15
LogAnalytics = $VMCount * 6.9
AgentOverhead = $VMCount * $AverageVMCost * 0.15
Management = 10 * 160 # 10 hours/month at $160/hour
}
$currentMonthly = ($ascCosts.Values | Measure-Object -Sum).Sum
# Agentless costs
$agentlessCosts = @{
Platform = [math]::Min($VMCount * 10, 999) # Volume pricing
Infrastructure = 50 # Fixed scanning infrastructure
Management = 2 * 160 # 2 hours/month
}
$agentlessMonthly = ($agentlessCosts.Values | Measure-Object -Sum).Sum
# Calculate ROI
$monthlyS savings = $currentMonthly - $agentlessMonthly
$annualSavings = $monthlySavings * 12
$threeYearSavings = $annualSavings * 3
return @{
CurrentMonthly = $currentMonthly
AgentlessMonthly = $agentlessMonthly
MonthlySavings = $monthlySavings
AnnualSavings = $annualSavings
ThreeYearSavings = $threeYearSavings
ROIPercentage = [math]::Round(($monthlySavings / $currentMonthly) * 100, 2)
PaybackPeriod = "Immediate"
}
}
# Example calculation
$roi = Calculate-SecurityROI -VMCount 100
$roi | Format-Table -AutoSize
Common Objections and Responses
”We lose threat detection without agents”
Reality: Modern agentless platforms provide:
- API-based threat detection using Azure Graph Security API
- Integration with Azure Sentinel for correlation
- Third-party threat intelligence feeds
- Behavioral analysis without performance impact
# Agentless threat detection
$threats = Search-AzGraph -Query @"
SecurityResources
| where type == 'microsoft.security/assessments'
| where properties.status.code == 'Unhealthy'
| where properties.metadata.severity == 'High'
| project threat = properties.displayName,
resource = properties.resourceDetails.id,
severity = properties.metadata.severity
"@
”Microsoft knows Azure best”
True, but:
- ASC is designed for enterprises, not SMBs
- Generic rules create noise for small teams
- Multi-cloud is reality for most organizations
- Cost model doesn’t scale down well
”Compliance requires agent-based scanning”
Not necessarily:
- Most frameworks require “appropriate monitoring”
- API-based scanning meets most requirements
- Compensating controls accepted by auditors
- Evidence collection works without agents
Decision Framework
Use this framework to decide your approach:
Choose_Azure_Security_Center_If:
- Budget exceeds $5,000/month for security
- Have dedicated security team (3+ people)
- Require real-time file integrity monitoring
- Need integrated EDR capabilities
- Single cloud (Azure only)
Choose_Agentless_If:
- Budget under $2,000/month for security
- Small IT team (<3 security staff)
- Multi-cloud environment
- Performance is critical
- Rapid deployment needed
Choose_Hybrid_If:
- Mixed criticality systems
- Compliance requires agents for some systems
- Budget between $2,000-5,000/month
- Gradual migration preferred
Next Steps: Implementation Roadmap
Week 1: Assessment
- Inventory current security spending
- Calculate agent performance impact
- Identify critical vs standard systems
- Review compliance requirements
Week 2: Pilot
- Deploy agentless scanner to dev environment
- Compare findings with current solution
- Measure performance improvements
- Calculate actual cost savings
Week 3: Validation
- Security team review of findings
- Compliance assessment
- Stakeholder approval
- Migration planning
Week 4: Production Rollout
- Deploy to 10% of production
- Monitor for issues
- Gradual expansion
- Agent removal (if applicable)
Conclusion
The choice between Azure Security Center and agentless scanning isn’t about better or worse – it’s about fit for purpose. For most SMBs, agentless scanning provides:
- 70-85% cost reduction versus Azure Security Center
- Zero performance impact on protected systems
- 95% security coverage for configuration and compliance
- Multi-cloud capability for hybrid environments
- 5x faster deployment with minimal complexity
The math is compelling: A 100-VM organization saves $49,572 annually by switching to agentless scanning, while maintaining comprehensive security coverage. That’s enough to hire an additional security engineer or invest in other critical security tools.
For organizations looking to implement agentless scanning quickly, platforms like PathShield provide enterprise-grade agentless security with visual attack path mapping and automated remediation – essentially delivering everything described in this guide as a managed service, typically at 80% less than Azure Security Center.
The future of cloud security is agentless. The only question is when you’ll make the switch.